Student self assessment software

One-to-one technology can transform a classroom. When implemented correctly, students are engaged and excited to learn, and teachers can assess their progress in real-time.

The amount of technology resources available for educators can be overwhelming. Whether your students regularly visit a computer lab, borrow a cart of laptops, or have access to a class set of iPads, there are a variety of assessment tools that are free and customizable. These online resources can be used before, during, and after a daily lesson or semester-long unit. Create your own assessments using Socrative. This amazing website can work in any classroom where students might complete an exit slip, a quick quiz, or multiple-choice exam.

All of the data collected can be exported into spreadsheets, making it easy to access and analyze results. So much more than Facebook for your classroom, Edmodo is a fantastic tool for collecting student work and assigning quizzes.

It would be interesting to determine if use of the software and its visual feedback when faculty members were not available would be of significant benefit to students.

Additionally, the use of the software as an aid for faculty calibration should be explored. By establishing an ideal tolerance, faculty members can compare their grading techniques and adjust their methods of deductions accordingly. This study found that utilizing computer software to evaluate student wax-ups provided feedback that was both reliable and repeatable. The software was shown to provide evaluations that were significantly more precise than the hand-grading by faculty members.

Further research should be conducted to evaluate the efficacy of this software as a self-assessment tool and as a method of faculty calibration in dental education. Karen R. Anthony S. Mennito, Assistant Professor, James B. Yianne G. Richard A. Bethany J. Wolf, Assistant Professor, James B. Walter G. Renne, Associate Professor, James B. National Center for Biotechnology Information , U.

J Dent Educ. Author manuscript; available in PMC Jun 1. Mennito , DDS, Dr. Kritzas , DMD, Dr. Wolf , PhD, and Dr. Renne , DMD. Mennito Assistant Professor, James B. Jompobe Vuthiganon. Wolf Assistant Professor, James B. Renne Associate Professor, James B.

Author information Copyright and License information Disclaimer. Direct correspondence to: Dr. Copyright notice. The publisher's final edited version of this article is available at J Dent Educ.

See other articles in PMC that cite the published article. Abstract Traditionally, evaluating student work in preclinical courses has relied on the judgment of experienced clinicians utilizing visual inspection. Keywords: dental education, grading, assessment, preclinical education, E4D Compare. Open in a separate window. Figure 1. Process by which E4D Technologies software calculates feedback on student wax-up Note: The software scans the ideal and student models and uses millions of data points from the adjacent teeth and typodont base to combine and overlay the two.

Figure 2. Color-coded map of differences showing where student has made errors Note: The software codes green as acceptable, red to yellow as overreduced or undercontoured, and blue as underreduced or over-contoured. Figure 3. Differences in software tolerance values that result in varying amount of acceptable color green Note: Alterations in the strictness or tolerance value generate different results. Results The mean differences between faculty grades and the grades provided by the two E4D machines at each of the 25 tolerance values were compared to determine which tolerance value was closest to the faculty grades.

Figure 4. Table 1 Consistency in student wax-up grades between the software with multiple settings relative to average of faculty hand-grading. Discussion The null hypothesis was that there was no difference in rater reliability when comparing one grading machine to another machine and one faculty member to another faculty member intraclass , the same faculty and same machine at different times intrarater , or between faculty and machines interrater. Conclusion This study found that utilizing computer software to evaluate student wax-ups provided feedback that was both reliable and repeatable.

Contributor Information Dr. References 1. Boud D. Enhancing learning through self-assessment. London: Kogan Page; Lindemann RA, Jedrychowski J. Self-assessed clinical competence: a comparison between students in an advanced dental education elective and in the general clinic.

Eur J Dent Educ. Poor self-assessment in a well-defined domain. AMEE medical education guide no. Med Teach. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. Student experiences of assessment in two problem-based dental curricula: Adelaide and Dublin. Then start using our online assessment software to easily set up your custom assessment.

Take a look at all the features and solutions. Our online assessment tool is simple and easy to use. For participants as well as for the administrators. With our online assessment software it's easy to start, which makes it more fun. It doesn't matter if you are on a phone, tablet or pc: your online assessment will look beautiful. Our assessment tool is fully responsive, so you can engage your audience on any platform. Do you have any questions about our online assessment tool? Our support owls are always by your side and provide you with the best possible support!

Easy LMS has allowed us to transition from sending trainings via email, to an easy to navigate platform that our employees can easily access and reference as they are onboarding with the company.

We are also able to track performance on trainings, so that we can ensure all employees receive the trainings they need to succeed!

We want to thank the Easy LMS team, because they have always solved our doubts, and Easy LMS is very easy to use and allows us to manage our information in a more effective way. Easy LMS, with the Academy add-on, has allowed us to deliver training and assessments to over specialists to date, with this number growing week to week.

With this, our accreditation process has been awarded official LIBF accreditation as a body of learning for specialist mortgages, something that we believe is not available anywhere else in the market.